SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES

March 30, 2025
THE FIELDS INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES


August 17-21, 2015
Location: Fields Institute, 222 College St., Toronto

Steering Committee:

Amr S. Helmy Director, CQIQC, Toronto
Paul Brumer, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto
Daniel James, Department of Physics, University of Toronto
Li Qian, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto
Hoi-Kwong Lo, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto
Aephraim Steinberg, Department of Physics, University of Toronto


 


Abstracts

 

Itai Arad
National University of Singapore

Local reversibility in ground states of many-body local Hamiltonians

Gapped ground states define quantum phases of matter at zero temperature and govern the low-temperature physics of quantum many-body systems. Minimizing the energy of local interactions, ground states often reflect strong properties of locality such as the area law for entanglement entropy and the exponential decay of correlations. In this talk I will present a novel characterization of locality in quantum states, called `local reversibility'. It characterizes the type of operations that are needed to reverse the action of a general disturbance on the state. I will show that unique ground states of gapped local Hamiltonian are locally reversible and use it to identify new fundamental features of many-body ground states: exponential bounds on the fluctuations of local order parameters, a rigorous bound on the quality of mean-field approximations, and a new general inequality among critical exponents.

 


 

Todd Brun
University of Southern California

Quantum measurements by feedback control

The broadest notion of a quantum measurement is the generalized measurement, defined by a set of measurement operators, and including a wide variety of quantum operations. Generalized measurements include weak measurements, where the measurement operators are close to the identity, and where each measurement disturbs the state very little but also gives little information. The limit of a suitable sequence of weak measurements is a continuous measurement. Continuous measurements include such commonly used techniques as photodetection, homodyne, and heterodyne measurements. It is possible to decompose any generalized measurement into a continuous measurement process; however, for most measurements this can only be done using feedback, in which the weak measurement done depends on the outcomes of the earlier weak measurements. For a two-outcome measurement, such a process has the structure of a random walk on a curve in operator space. An important question then arises: given a particular family of weak measurements that can be done on a physical system, what set of generalized measurements does this admit? We consider continuous measurements done by weak interactions between the system and a sequence of qubit probes. If the interaction Hamiltonian is fixed, this admits only a very limited class of generalized measurements (where the measurement operators have only two singular values). If the interaction Hamiltonian has a set of linear controls, a broader class of measurements becomes possible; this class is characterized by the closed Jordan algebras contained in the span of the Hamiltonian terms. These are nonassociative operator algebras where the multiplication operation is given by the anticommutator. This algebraic description is surprising, and is in some ways parallel to the characterization of unitary transformations in terms of Lie algebras.


 

Tommaso Calarco
University of Ulm

Controlled quantum many-body dynamics: nonlinearity, reversibility, complexity

The control of quantum states is an important building block for fundamental investigations and technological applications of quantum physics. However, quantum many-body systems exhibit complex behaviors that make them difficult to manipulate, in particular in the presence of intrinsic dephasing, decoherence or decay. One strategy to control such quantum states is to implement operations faster than the characteristic timescales of the prejudicial processes, using for example optimal control theory (OCT). The speedup can be exploited to experimentally realize elaborate manipulations, for instance precisely controlled ultra-fast single electron spin gates using specially designed microwave fields [1] or a sequence of state transfer pulses for interferometry [2].

The maximum achievable speedup is influenced non-trivially by inter-particle interactions, but their effect can be compensated for if many-body nonlinearity is properly taken into account (see Fig. 1).

Reversibility of quantum dynamics can also be attained experimentally via optimal control [4]. The bandwidth of the corresponding control pulses allows for a characterization of quantum many-body processes [5], and for dynamical discrimination between different level of complexity in quantum many-body systems.

[1] J. Scheuer, X. Kong, R. Said, J. Chen, A. Kurz, L. Marseglia, J. Du, P. Hemmer, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, B. Naydenov, F. Jelezko, New J. Phys. 16, 093022 (2014).
[2] S. van Frank, A. Negretti, T. Berrada, T. Bücker, S. Montangero, J.-F. Schaff, T. Schumm, T. Calarco, J. Schmiedmayer, Nature Communications 5, 4009 (2014).
[3] I. Brouzos, A. Streltsov, A. Negretti, R. Said, T. Caneva, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, arXiv:1504.02858.
[4] C. Lovecchio, F. Schäfer, S. Cherukattil, A. K. Murtaza, I. Herrera, F. Cataliotti, T. Calarco, S. Montangero, F. Caruso, arXiv:1405.6918; in preparation.
[5] T. Caneva, A. Silva, R. Fazio, S. Lloyd, T. Calarco, S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. A 89, 042322 (2014); S. Lloyd and S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 010502 (2014).

With images: PDF

 


 

Bob Coecke
Oxford University

From quantum foundations to natural language meaning via string diagrams

Earlier work on an entirely diagrammatic formulation of quantum theory, which is soon to appear in the form of a textbook, has somewhat surprisingly guided us towards providing an answer for the following question: how do we produce the meaning of a sentence given that we understand the meaning of its words? The correspondence between these seemingly far apart areas was established in terms of string diagrams. This work has practical applications in the area of Natural Language Processing.

 


 

Jens Eisert
Freie Universität Berlin

Certifying quantum devices

A key task in the study of quantum simulators and devices in quantum information science is the certification that a device actually functions in precisely the anticipated fashion. In this talk, I will present several aspects of this task. We will start from notions of non-commutative compressed sensing in order to economically perform quantum state tomography of approximately low-rank states [1-3], as well as notions of quantum field tomography [4]. We will then turn to elaborating on the question how the correct state preparation can be achieved yet much more efficiently, and how this can be done in a rigorous and at the same time experimentally friendly way [5]. The final theme will be concerned with a make-or-break question for quantum simulators: Namely, to what extent the functioning of a device can be certified without the need of being able to efficiently predict the outcome of a quantum simulation, which is supposedly out of reach [6].

References:

[1] Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150401 (2010).
[2] arXiv:1504.04194 (2015).
[3] In preparation (2015).
[4] Nature Comm. 6, 7663 (2015).
[5] Nature Comm. 7 (2015).
[6] In preparation (2015).

 


 

K. Rajibul Islam
Harvard University

Measuring entanglement entropy in Bose-Hubbard systems

In recent years, entanglement has emerged as a central concept in our understanding of quantum many-body physics. Theoretically, it has been intensely investigated to characterize quantum phases of matter, and probe quantum criticality, non-equilibrium dynamics, and topological order. Experimental measurement of entanglement in spatial degrees of freedom in itinerant systems of delocalized particles, however, remains an outstanding challenge. In this talk, I will present experimental results on measuring entanglement in a Bose-Hubbard system of ultra-cold atoms by preparing and interfering two copies of a quantum many-body state. This many-body interference enables us to directly measure the quantum purity, second-order Renyi entanglement entropy and mutual information without explicitly reconstructing the quantum state.


 

Ivette Fuentes
University of Vienna

Relativity in the quantum lab

Quantum experiments are reaching relativistic regimes. Quantum communication protocols have been demonstrated at long lenghts scales and experiments are underway to distribute entanglement between Earth and Satellite-based links. At these regimes the Global Positioning System requieres relativistic corrections. Therefore, it is necessary to understand how does motion and gravity will affect long-range quantum experiments. Interestingly, relativistic effects can also be observed at small lengths scales. Some effects have been demonstrated in superconducting circuits involving boundary conditions moving at relativistic speeds and quantum clocks have been used to measure time dilation in table-top experiments. In this talk I will present a formalism for the study of relativistic effects on quantum technologies. This formalism is also applicable in the development of new quantum technologies that can be used to deepen our understanding of physics in the overlap of quantum theory and relativity. Examples include gravimeters, accelerometers and spacetime probes underpinned by quantum field theory in curved spacetime.

 


 

Jay M. Gambetta
IBM TJ Watson Lab USA

Progress in superconducting qubits: Detecting arbitrary single-qubit errors in a planar sublattice of the surface code

I will review IBM’s current approach towards quantum computing with superconducting qubits. The goal is to build a system using quantum error correction
schemes based on rotated surface codes, which has a high error threshold, requires only nearest-neighbor qubit interactions, and uses simple syndrome extraction circuits. I will discuss our results on achieving high fidelity two- and single- quit gates, long coherence times, and our recent experimental demonstrating the [[2,0,2]] code on a 2x2 square lattice of superconducting qubits.

 


 

Kurt Jacobs
University of Massachusetts

Completing Fermi's Golden Rule: the origin of rate equations in open quantum systems

Fermi's golden rule is widely used, and the resulting transition rates are an important part of the thermal behaviour of open quantum systems. But this rule is curious because it is valid outside the regime in which it is derived: It is derived only for short times and for off-resonant transitions but works for all times and for resonant transitions. Here we show analytically that an interaction with a resonant, dense spectrum induces a rate equation for all times, giving essentially exact exponential decay in the appropriate regime. From this analysis we are able to
extract the decay rate, which is indeed the rate of Fermi's golden rule (with a small correction), the short, non-Markovian time period before which the rate equation sets in, and determine the parameter regime required for this behavior. Our analysis provides the start of a more solid foundation on which to model thermal baths in terms of interactions with dense spectra.

 


 

Anthony J. Leggett
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The mean-field method in the theory of superconductivity: is it adequate for quantum-information applications?

For more than fifty years condensed-matter theorists have used for all but the simplest problems the so-called mean-field (Bogoliubov-de Gennes) method,which is usually justified by appeal to the concept of spontaneously broken U(1) symmetry.In recent years this method has in particular been applied to the analysis of schemes for
the implementation of topologically protected quantum computing,e.g.in strontium ruthenate.In this talk,using a couple of simple examples,I argue that the method is untrustworthy as soon as the Cooper pairs have nontrivial degrees of freedom,and that it may be necessary to re-evaluate the results obtained using it.

 


 

Daniel Lidar
University of Southern California

Quantum annealing and optimization: are we there yet?

In October 2011 USC and Lockheed-Martin jointly founded a quantum computing center housing the first commercial quantum annealer built by D-Wave Systems. These programmable processors use superconducting flux qubits and are designed to minimize the energy of classical spin-glass models with as many spins as qubits, an NP-hard problem with numerous applications. There has been much controversy surrounding the D-Wave processors, questioning whether they offer any advantage over classical computing. I will survey our recent work on testing the processors for quantum effects, benchmarking them against highly optimized classical algorithms, and improving their performance using error correction.

References:

- T. Rønnow et al., “Defining and detecting quantum speedup” Science 345, 420 (2014).
- S. Boixo et al., “Quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits”, Nature Phys. 10, 218 (2014).
- K. Pudenz et al., “Error corrected quantum annealing with hundreds of qubits”, Nature Commun. 5, 3243 (2014).
- I. Hen et al., “Probing for quantum speedup in spin glass problems with planted solutions”, arXiv:1502.01663



 

Klaus Mølmer
Aarhus University

The past state of a monitored quantum system

If a quantum system is monitored continuously in time, its wave function or density matrix evolves by a combination of unitary and stochastic changes. While conventional quantum theory accounts for this evolution and provides the probabilities for the outcome of future measurements, it has been widely ignored that monitoring of a system also supplements hindsight knowledge about its earlier evolution.

In the talk I shall present how hindsight knowledge can be formally represented as a time evolving (past) quantum state, which depends on both earlier and later monitoring outcomes [1]. I will show examples of its application to the analysis of real experiments [2,3,4], and I will discuss how some questions of more foundational character relate to the new state concept and formalism.

References:

[1] Søren Gammelmark, Brian Julsgaard, and Klaus Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160401 (2013).
[2] P. Campagne-Ibarcq, L. Bretheau, E. Flurin, A. Auffèves, F. Mallet, and B. Huard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 180402 (2014).
[3] T. Rybarczyk, B. Peaudecerf, M. Penasa, S. Gerlich, B. Julsgaard, K. Mølmer, S. Gleyzes, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, S. Haroche, and I. Dotsenko, Phys. Rev. A 91, 062116 (2015).
[4] D. Tan, S. Weber, I. Siddiqi, K. Mølmer, K. W. Murch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 090403 (2015).

 


 

Bertrand Reulet
Université de Sherbrooke

Generation of Entangled Microwave Radiation by Electron Shot Noise

A classical current in a conductor radiates a classical electromagnetic field. We explore some properties of the field radiated by a conductor when electron transport must be described by quantum mechanics, i.e. when the electron current becomes quantum itself. We have measured the quadratures of the field generated by a tunnel junction placed at ultra-low temperature in the presence of ac+dc voltage bias. We demonstrate the existence of two-mode squeezing as well as entanglement between quadratures at two different frequencies, thus proving that the electron shot noise generates a quantum electromagnetic field. We analyze our results by linking the operators of the (bosonic) electromagnetic field with the (fermionic) electron current operator. We show a very good agreement between our results and the appropriate current-current correlator of the electron system.

 


 

 

Terence Rudolph
Imperial College, London

How Einstein and/or Schroedinger should have discovered Bell’s Theorem

I will present some proofs of Bell’s theorem that are very simple if one assumes “Einstein locality” as opposed to Bell’s “local causality”. I will show that the proofs actually rule out a different class of theories than do proofs based on local causality and will also connect these proofs to a weakened variant of Spekkens’ notion of generalised contextuality.



 

Jeffrey H. Shapiro
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Quantum Imaging: Is it the future, or does it have a future?

Light is intrinsically quantum mechanical, and photodetection is a quantum measurement. Consequently, all imaging is really quantum mechanical. It has long been known, however, that the semiclassical theory of photodetection—in which light is a classical field and the discreteness of the electron charge results in photodetection shot noise—predicts measurement statistics identical to those obtained from quantum theory when the illumination is in a classical state, namely a Glauber coherent state or a classically-random mixture of such states, and one of the standard detection paradigms is employed, i.e., heterodyne, homodyne, or direct detection. (See [1] for a review of quantum versus semiclassical photodetection.) Thus, because experiments whose quantitative behavior is correctly predicted by two disparate theories cannot distinguish between those two theories, it is entirely appropriate that the term quantum imaging be reserved for imagers whose quantitative understanding requires the use of quantum theory. (See [2–4] for how a debate on this point has been settled with regards to pseudothermal ghost imaging.) This talk will present a broad overview of quantum imaging that will include—but go well beyond—ghost imaging to encompass: the quantum limit of the camera; quantum enhancement in laser-radar imaging; linear optics approaches to sub-Rayleigh imaging; variations on the theme of optical coherence tomography; first-photon imaging and related techniques; quantum reading and phase estimation; and imaging with undetected photons. A recurring theme will be the degree to which imagers originally developed in the quantum domain have classical counterparts that can equal or exceed the capabilities of their quantum predecessors. This quantum-mimetic behavior, as well as the overly-constrained theoretical scenarios in which some quantum imagers have been shown to have definite performance gains over their best classical-imaging competitors, leads to the question posed in the title. It is a question that still awaits a definitive answer.

References:

1. J. H. Shapiro, “The quantum theory of optical communications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15, 1547–1569 (2009).
2. J. H. Shapiro and R. W. Boyd, “The physics of ghost imaging.,” Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 949–993 (2012).
3. Y. Shih, “The physics of ghost imaging: nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?,” Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 995–1001 (2012).
4. J. H. Shapiro and R. W. Boyd, “Response to ‘The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?’,” Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 1003–1011 (2012).

 


 

Irfan Siddiqi
University of California, Berkeley

Unraveling the Quantum Ensemble

We use continuous weak measurements in conjunction with Bayesian statistics to reconstruct the real-time evolution of the wavefunction describing a two-state system at the level of individual quantum trajectories. Both the case of measurement induced collapse as well as driven unitary evolution are investigated in a cavity coupled superconducting transmon qubit. A variety of statistical metrics are extracted, including the most probable path-analogous to the geodesic in space-time-between two points in Hilbert space. Quantitative agreement with a path integral formalism for the trajectories and their distribution is achieved, opening the door for new quantum control protocols. Furthermore, extensions to many-body quantum systems may promise a route toward more efficient quantum verification and validation of systems with exponentially increasing complexity.

 


 

Rob Spekkens
Perimeter Institute

Experimental tests of noncontextuality without unwarranted idealizations

To make precise the sense in which nature fails to respect classical physics, one requires a formal notion of classicality. Ideally, such a notion should be defined operationally, so that it can be subjected to a direct experimental test, and it should be applicable in a wide variety of experimental scenarios, so that it can cover the breadth of phenomena that are thought to defy classical understanding. Bell's notion of local causality fulfills the first criterion but not the second. The notion of noncontextuality fulfills the second criterion, but it is a long-standing question whether it can be made to fulfill the first. Previous attempts to experimentally test noncontextuality have all presumed certain idealizations that do not hold in real experiments, namely, noiseless measurements and exact operational equivalences. In this talk, I will show how to devise tests that are free of these idealizations and report on a photonic implementation of one such test that rules out noncontextual models with high confidence.

 


 

Michael Thewalt
Simon Fraser University

28Si - a 'semiconductor vacuum' host for spin qubits

Highly enriched 28Si provides a nuclear spin free host material into which impurities with electronic and/or nuclear spins having remarkably long coherence times can be placed and manipulated. It also holds the promise of inheriting the highly developed Si device nanotechnology to enable the scalability of a qubit technology. However, 28Si has another unique property which has nothing directly to do with spin - it has optical transitions which are much narrower than the already sharp transitions in natural Si. This provides us with new optical "handles" on the electronic and nuclear spins of potential qubits in 28Si, including the shallow donor impurities which have received much recent attention. This has enabled ensemble measurements of record solid state coherence times.


 

Robert Whitney
CNRS Grenoble

Maximum efficiency at given power output in 2 or 3 terminal quantum thermoelectrics

Carnot efficiency is only achievable at zero power output. So what is the maximum efficiency at a given finite power output? It appears that this question is ill-defined in classical thermodynamics, but can be answered with a quantum theory.

We use the Landauer scattering theory to find this maximum efficiency for heat engines and refrigerators made of thermoelectric quantum systems. We find the maximum efficiency at given power output for two-terminal systems without energy relaxation [1]. This bound scales like the system's transverse cross-section in units of the Fermi wavelength. For typical parameters, it means one needs a heat-engine of nearly 1cm across to ensure a power output of 100 Watts at an efficiency close to that of Carnot. We use phenomenological models to explore whether this maximum can be exceeded by two-terminal systems with relaxation [2], or by three-terminal systems [3]. We have not yet found a system which can do so, although open questions remain.


Back to top